Navigating Native Advertising
What are you hearing about native advertising? Here’s what we’ve heard:
“The online ad industry is going native.” “It’s the hottest thing going in advertising” “It’s the savior of the industry.” All of these quotes (found in various stories and blog posts on the topic) might lead you to believe you’re missing out on an advertising revolution. Or they might lead you to ask “what the hell is native advertising?” Either way, as a hospital marketer it’s important to put native advertising in the right context, so you can know whether it makes sense for your marketing goals.
A rose by any other name…
Let’s start with the issue of definition, because it seems advertising professionals themselves can’t define what is meant by “native advertising.” For example, here’s what Wikipedia says:
Native advertising is a web advertising method in which the advertiser attempts to gain attention by providing content in the context of the user’s experience. Native ad formats match both the form and the function of the user experience in which it is placed.
Got it? It’s a little vague, and we would argue, a little limiting, given that many forms of native advertising (as we’ll demonstrate) take place offline. Or how about this gem? Felix Salmon, a Reuters columnist, is quoted in this blog post on Mashable, defining native advertising in this way:
A native ad is something that consumers read, interact with, even share — it fills up their attention space, for a certain period of time, in a way that banner ads never do . . . In that sense, TV ads are truly native; the way you consume a TV ad is the same as the way you consume a TV show. Similarly, long copy print ads are native, for the same reason.
Say again? TV ads are “native” because you consume them in the same way you consume a TV show? Well, yes, that’s true. But what advertising isn’t consumed in the same way the content around it is consumed? Assigning a defining label that applies to an entire universe isn’t much of a defining label. At Interval, here’s how we describe native advertising: advertising with the intent of attracting audiences because of how it mirrors both the form and the value of the content that surrounds it. For example, the classic form of native advertising is the advertorial, a print ad that is designed using a long-copy format to try and replicate the editorial that surrounds it in a magazine or newspaper. That design is intentional: the advertising is hoping the reader will value the content in the ad in the same way they value the content in the magazine, and at some level, hopes the reader doesn’t even notice the shift from editorial to paid content given the similar form of the long copy ad. Not all native advertising works just like an advertorial, but it does share the common trait of intending to draw in readers/viewers/listeners/surfers by blurring the lines between the publisher’s content and the advertiser’s content, both in look and in the content itself. As we delve into later, that “blurriness” can cause problems with native advertising, because it often feels that in some cases advertisers are trying to pull a fast one on audiences by trying to equate their advertising with the content the audience values in the first place. And as marketers of hospitals and health systems, we need to be particularly in tune to any effort that pushes those kinds of boundaries.
Contrasting native with other advertising
To help further clarify the situation, it can help to contrast native advertising with similar (but not identical) marketing concepts. For example, while some native advertising could be considered content marketing (what we define as the strategy of targeting audiences with messages, information, tools or interactions that have value outside of a purchasing need), not all content marketing is native. Native advertising is often confused with “contextual advertising,” which is loosely defined as advertising that takes into account its surroundings to further connect with the audience. For example, a testimonial TV spot featuring famed racecar driver Jeff Gordon for Quaker State Oil that runs during a NASCAR race would be considered contextual advertising. It’s not native advertising, however, because it’s not trying to replicate the form of the content that surrounds it (while it’s on TV like the content that surrounds it, it doesn’t take the same form – a live race). The advertiser also isn’t expecting you to value the ad in the same way as the race, because it’s clear it’s an ad (not the event itself). And finally, some folks might say “isn’t this just PR?” Native advertising is different in two fundamental ways: for one, PR – specifically media relations – lands your product, service or organization in the actual editorial content (like a story on how your emergency department saves lives), not in the advertising that surrounds it. And second, while you spend money on PR efforts, you don’t pay the publisher/resource to cover your product, service or organization. With native advertising, you’re most definitely paying to play.
Now that we have a clear (?) definition of native advertising, how should you leverage it when marketing your hospital or health system? Like any marketing channel or tactic, you need to evaluate how effective this particular approach is given your marketing goal, your budget, your brand, your competitors and everything else that matters. But with native advertising, we think you need to take an extra step to make sure that if you leverage it, you do so within some sort of ethical boundaries. Because as we mentioned, the lines are very blurred and ever moving with native advertising regarding what’s right and what’s wrong, what feels ethical and what doesn’t, and what’s legal and what’s not. For example, go back to the advertorial example. For many people, the more an advertorial attempts to replicate the content around it, the more underhanded it seems. That’s an inherent conundrum with native advertising – the closer an advertiser comes to replicating the form and value of the surrounding content, the more likely they are to cross the line and become misleading. There often seems to be a correlation between the “sneakiness” of such an ad and the advertiser behind it – those products or companies using the more extreme versions of advertorials often come off as less-than-stellar brands, which is the danger of misusing native advertising.
Trust and transparency
At Interval, we believe there are two criteria – “trust” and “transparency” – hospitals and health systems can use to help decide whether your native ad will be effective or prompt a negative reaction. “Trust,” speaks to the level to which an audience member relies on the integrity of the publisher’s actual content to form their own opinions and decisions. And “transparency,” speaks to how obvious it is to the audience member that what they’re experiencing is actually an ad. Many would use transparency alone to judge the ethics of a native ad, but we think both must be used together. For example, consider another classic form of native advertising – product placement in a movie. Showing an Apple laptop in use in a James Bond movie matches the “form” – the product is literally “in” the content – and the hope is that you’ll “value” the product in some way because of it (even just seeing it there builds awareness, whether or not equating Apple to a sexy British spy changes your perception one way or the other of the product). With this type of product placement, however, there’s no transparency whatsoever. You have no explicit indication that it’s a paid product placement. If that were all that mattered, you might storm out of the movie theater, protesting loudly at the disgusting nature of the trickery. But honestly, most of us would say “eh, who cares?” That’s because no trust has really been broken. We expect entertainment from a movie and don’t expect a level of integrity from the movie or its producers as far as helping us form opinions, make decisions or otherwise gain from the content. So the native ad feels ok, and possibly, it improves upon the content. (Notice how this scenario might change dramatically in, say, a documentary film, where a gratuitous product placement might make you question the integrity of the film-makers.) To help you construct boundaries that work for you and your healthcare organization, here are examples that, from Interval’s perspective, lay out in clear “black and white” terms what works and what doesn’t from an ethical standpoint in native advertising. We’ll cover the “gray” area as well.
When both the trust and transparency criteria fail the sniff test, a native ad could actually illicit negative feelings from the audience, which would then be associated with your brand. Here’s an example.